Monday 14 November 2011

CBR3 Book 95: "Fitzwilliam Darcy, Rock Star" by Heather Lynn Rigaud

Publisher: Sourcebooks Landmark
Page count: 432 pages
Rating: 3 stars
Date begun: November 12th, 2011
Date finished: November 13th, 2011

In Fitzwilliam Darcy, Rock Star, Jane Austen's most famous hero is not a repressed Regency gentleman, but the world famous guitarist and founder of rock band Slurry. He, his cousin Richard Fitzwilliam (on drums) and best friend Charles Bingley (lead singer and bass) are known for their wild partying, and seem unable to keep a support act for more than half a tour. They're about to embark on the biggest tour of their career, and need to find a new support act quickly. When they audition the girl band, Long Borne Suffering, featuring sisters Jane Bennett on vocals and bass, Lizzy Bennett on guitar and their best friend Charlotte Lucas on drums, they seem to have finally found what they're looking for.

Heather Lynn Rigaud takes the story of Pride and Prejudice and modernises it fairly successfully. Taking one of the most famous and beloved romantic classics and doing new things with it seems to be all the rage. This works better than some I've come across.  Mostly, I think the author took the characters of the original novel and gave them 21st Century personalities very successfully indeed. There's three separate couples who need to find their HEAs in this, and while I can totally see why a modernised version of the story needs to have sex in it, some of the sex scenes did seem a bit superflous, and got a bit repetitive after a while. A fun read, and a creative re-imagining of Austen's timeless classic, but again, I have to disagree with Publishers' Weekly that it was one of the best romances of the year. They clearly haven't read the same books I have this year.

1 comment:

  1. I am also a big fan of historical romance fictions. I have just started a blog (http://romanticfictions.blogspot.com) to write about the books I have read so far...It will be fun to share our experiences..

    ReplyDelete